A highly provocative claim has emerged from Iran, suggesting that Pakistan has vowed to launch a nuclear strike against Israel should Tel Aviv use nuclear weapons against Iran. This statement, made by General Mohsen Rezaei, a senior member of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), on Iranian state television, immediately raised concerns about a severe escalation of the Middle East conflict, potentially involving nuclear-armed states.
General Rezaei’s assertion, while lacking official confirmation from Islamabad, has sent ripples of apprehension across the region. Pakistan’s official stance on such matters has historically remained diplomatic, and no immediate confirmation or denial of the Iranian general’s specific claims has been issued by Islamabad.
However, security analysts are quick to point out Pakistan’s established nuclear capabilities, including its Shaheen-3 ballistic missile, which theoretically possesses the range to strike Israel. This context lends a dangerous dimension to Iran’s claim, even if it serves primarily as a deterrent or a piece of strategic messaging.
Experts suggest that while Iran’s statement might be aimed at dissuading Israel from any nuclear action, it carries the inherent risk of dragging additional nuclear-armed nations into the volatile Israel-Iran conflict. Such an escalation could have devastating consequences, not just for the immediate belligerents but for the broader regional and global security landscape.
The ongoing hostilities between Israel and Iran have already intensified, with both sides reportedly conducting strikes on each other’s territories. Amidst this backdrop, the introduction of a nuclear dimension through such public claims significantly amplifies the stakes. International observers are closely monitoring the situation, urging de-escalation to prevent a miscalculation that could lead to an unprecedented catastrophe. The veracity of Iran’s claim and Pakistan’s subsequent response will undoubtedly shape the narrative and trajectory of this critical regional conflict.